秘密直播

News

秘密直播 APL, Navy Team up to Advance Additive Manufacturing for Critical Missions

Listen to this article

Audio generated using AI voice technology.

Over the past decade, additive manufacturing has emerged as a disruptive force in advanced defense manufacturing. However, skepticism about its reliability 鈥 particularly for building crucial military hardware 鈥 has hindered its adoption. Now, through a collaborative effort with the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), researchers at the 秘密直播 Applied Physics Laboratory (APL), in Laurel, Maryland, are working to change that narrative.

APL has been playing a critical role in NAVSEA鈥檚 adoption of laser powder bed fusion, an advanced metal 3D-printing process, demonstrating that precise control over the technology yields consistent, high-quality materials for even its most demanding applications. By conducting extensive research and rigorous testing and actively engaging the technical community of NAVSEA, APL鈥檚 researchers are proving that additive manufacturing is not just viable, but essential to NAVSEA鈥檚 future.

A Shift in the Narrative

Metal additive manufacturing is generally regarded with skepticism because of concerns about porosity, mechanical reliability and reproducibility, explained Michael Presley, an additive manufacturing engineer in APL鈥檚 Research and Exploratory Development Department. 鈥淢ost of the previous literature painted a picture of inconsistency,鈥 he said.

However, recent academic work by APL has made significant strides in changing this perception. demonstrated that precise control over process parameters eliminates porosity concerns, ensuring additively manufactured parts meet stringent quality standards. compared material properties across multiple vendors, proving that consistency can be achieved industry-wide. focused on long-term durability, showing that additively manufactured components can maintain performance levels comparable to traditionally manufactured parts.

Together, Presley said, these findings provide compelling evidence that additive manufacturing is viable for naval applications. 鈥淲hat we鈥檝e shown through rigorous research is that as long as you control your feedstock, process parameters and post-processing, you can get highly consistent material properties.鈥

And this shift is more than academic 鈥 it has real-world implications for how NAVSEA designs and sustains its fleet, noted Eddie Gienger, who, along with Presley, was deeply involved in the research. 鈥淭he expected service life of a Virginia-class submarine is 33 years. NAVSEA must have confidence in the lifespan of additively built components compared to those manufactured with traditional processes.鈥

One of NAVSEA鈥檚 greatest challenges in adopting additive manufacturing has been ensuring that parts produced by different vendors maintain uniform quality. And ensuring consistency across different suppliers is no small task. Differences in process control, material properties and manufacturing conditions can lead to unpredictable variations in final part quality.

Recognizing this, NAVSEA has made it a priority to establish clear standards and processes that ensure every part meets the same high-performance requirements 鈥 no matter where or how it鈥檚 made. 鈥淲e don鈥檛 just need additive manufacturing to work 鈥 it needs it to work predictably,鈥 said Justin Rettaliata, NAVSEA鈥檚 technical lead for additive manufacturing. 鈥淭o scale up, we need a mature industrial base that can produce additively manufactured parts at consistent quality levels across vendors and environments.鈥

APL has tackled this challenge by assessing the maturity of additive manufacturing processes and translating the results into meaningful requirements for NAVSEA. 鈥淎PL has spent years studying how variability in build parameters, raw material and machine conditions affect final material properties,鈥 said Presley. 鈥淭hat work has led to the development of standardized qualification approaches that NAVSEA can use to certify these parts.鈥

This research has directly influenced NAVSEA鈥檚 official manufacturing standards and certification guidelines, reducing the requirements for machine certification by over 60% while still ensuring stringent reliability standards. 鈥淚t was about refining what really matters,鈥 Presley noted. 鈥淚nstead of requiring 300 test samples and millions of dollars in qualification costs, we helped streamline the process into something practical yet robust.鈥

From Research to Deployment

APL is also serving as a bridge between fundamental research and real-world application, said James Borghardt, program manager for Maritime Expeditionary Logistics in APL鈥檚 Force Projection Sector.

鈥淲e don鈥檛 just study additive manufacturing,鈥 he said. 鈥淲e turn it into something the fleet can use.鈥

While much of APL鈥檚 research has focused on laser powder bed fusion, additive manufacturing as a whole is already making an operational impact. This capability was demonstrated recently when an amphibious Navy ship encountered a material failure that rendered a key component inoperable. The original part was not in stock, and traditional procurement would have taken six months to two years. Instead, APL and the ship鈥檚 crew worked together to reverse-engineer the part, create a digital file and fabricate it using wire-laser directed energy deposition 鈥 another form of additive manufacturing 鈥 all in just five days.

鈥淭hat鈥檚 what success looks like,鈥 said Borghardt. 鈥淩educing logistics delay time from months to days is a game-changer for operational availability.鈥

Although additive manufacturing has been invaluable for maintenance and repair, the real potential lies in designing new systems with it in mind. 鈥淲hen you are out at sea and something breaks, NAVSEA has a lot more tolerance for risk,鈥 explained Gienger. 鈥淚f a part lasts long enough to get a replacement, that鈥檚 acceptable. But what we鈥檙e talking about now is designing mission-critical systems that use additively manufactured parts from the start.鈥

For this to happen, NAVSEA needs deep confidence in the technology. 鈥淪uccess means a world where we are leveraging additive manufacturing not just for crisis fixes but for primary design and construction,鈥 said Rettaliata. 鈥淲e鈥檙e not quite there yet, but our work with APL is getting us closer every day.鈥